In this analysis I
will look at statistics of birth rates and see if there is a correlation
between these and Catholicism, or if there is other factors that can be used to
explain different birth rates, such as the level of education and access to health
care, or social and economic conditions.
Table 1. People
and Society
Country
|
% of catholic citizens
|
Birth rates, of 1,000 population
|
Infant mortality rates, of 1,000 live births
|
Life expectancy at birth
|
Population growth rate
|
Italy
|
80
|
8.95
|
3.33
|
81.95
|
0.34 %
|
Poland
|
89.8 (75
practicing)
|
9.88
|
6.3
|
76.45
|
- 0.9%
|
Colombia
|
90
|
16.98
|
15.46
|
75.02
|
1.1 %
|
Guam
|
85
|
17.23
|
5.61
|
78.66
|
0.34 %
|
Philippines
|
82.9 (80.9 roman
catholic)
|
24.62
|
18.19
|
72.21
|
1.84 %
|
Seychelles
|
82.3
|
14.85
|
11.06
|
74.01
|
0.9 %
|
Norway
|
1
|
10.8
|
3.47
|
80.44
|
0.33 %
|
Niger
|
Less than 1
|
46.84
|
87.89
|
53.34
|
3.32 %
|
Russia
|
Less than 1
|
12.11
|
7.19
|
69.85
|
- 0.02 %
|
Considering the Catholic
Church has a prohibition against birth control one would assume that nations
with a high percentage of catholic citizens would have a high birth rate. Based
on the statistics on table 1, we cannot see any obvious correlation. Among the
catholic nations we have Italy and Poland, who both has a birth rate even lower
than Norway, a country with no ideology prohibiting birth control. On the other
end of the scale, with high birth rates, we have catholic nations such as the
Phillippines but also non-catholic nations such as Niger. So if there is no
clear relation between the fact that Catholicism has prohibition against the
use of birth control, and the birth rates in different countries, what other
factors can we look at to explain this?
Table 2. Human
Development Index*
Country
|
Human Development Index
|
Birth rates, of 1,000 population
|
Norway
|
0.955
|
10.8
|
Italy
|
0.881
|
8.95
|
Seychelles
|
0.86
|
14.84
|
Poland
|
0.821
|
9.88
|
Russia
|
0.788
|
12.11
|
Colombia
|
0.719
|
16.98
|
Phillippines
|
0.654
|
18.19
|
Niger
|
0.475
|
46.84
|
As seen, the HDI
index is a composition between many indicators. It shows in a way how well it
is to live in a country. This could perhaps be linked to the r/K selection
theory. The higher a country scores on the HDI, the higher education people
have, more welfare considering health care, and more stability and security in
their life. In countries with high HDI, such as Norway and Italy, they focus
more on having fewer kids, use longer time to reproduce, have greater parental
investment, and they can do so because of a stable environment and good health
care which gives a low infant mortality rate, this is the
“K-selection/strategy”. On the other hand you have the “r-selection/strategy”
were one has more kids, use shorter time to reproduce, lesser parental
investment in the kids, due to a unstable environment and a high infant
mortality rate, in such as Niger, Colombia or the Philippines.
Of course there
are other factors that play an important role in family planning and birth
rates in different countries. As we see in the third table, countries such as
Italy and Russia has a quite high urban population, and many years of
education, and not that many living under poverty line (note that poverty is
defined by the nation itself, so its relative poverty measures), tend to have a
lower birth rate. On the other hand we have nations such as the Philippines and
Niger who has a lower urban population, less years of education and more people
living below the poverty line, there is a tendency to have a higher birth rate.
In the middle we have other nations such as Colombia that has a quite high
urban population, about the same years of education as Russia, but a way higher
population living below the poverty line.
Table 3. Urbanization,
education, poverty and birth rates
Country
|
Urban population
|
School life expectancy, years
|
Population below poverty line
|
Birth rates, of 1,000 population
|
Guam
|
93 %
|
NA
|
23 %
|
17.26
|
Norway
|
79 %
|
Female: 18
Male: 17
|
NA
|
10.8
|
Colombia
|
75 %
|
Female: 14
Male: 13
|
34.1 %
|
16.98
|
Russia
|
73.8 %
|
Female: 15
Male: 14
|
12.7 %
|
12.11
|
Italy
|
68 %
|
Female: 17
Male: 16
|
19.6 %
|
8.95
|
Poland
|
60.0 %
|
Female: 16
Male: 15
|
10.6 %
|
9.88
|
Seychelles
|
53.6 %
|
Female: 14
Male: 13
|
NA
|
14.85
|
Phillippines
|
48.8 %
|
Female: 12
Male: 11
|
26.5 %
|
18.19
|
Niger
|
17.8 %
|
Female: 5
Male: 6
|
63 %
|
46.84
|
To understand
birth rates we see that there is no correlation between Catholicism (and their
ideology prohibiting the use of birth control) and birth rates. I have pointed
out some factors that might be used to explain birthrates, such as how
developed a country is, urbanization, education, stability or instability
considering infant mortality and poverty. To extend the study more one could
include data over female employment, the cost of raising kids / kids used as
labor force, age at marriage (or first child born) and many other factors. I would
argue that to understand birth rates completely one would have to include many
other factors and do a deeper study.
Ingen kommentarer:
Legg inn en kommentar